One thing ICANN could do to gain some legitimacy to govern would be  
to incorporate into it's operation principles agreed to in the  
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such as freedom of expression  
and individual privacy.   But there is a lot of pressure on ICANN to  
do just the opposite unfortunately.

Robin



On Jan 21, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:

> At 4:30 PM +0900 1/21/08, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>> I hope the NCUC will support ICANN's response to the JPA, that it
>> should be concluded, but we should also require continued independent
>> oversight to assess bylaws compliance, progress with milestones, etc.
>
>
> If so, these positions should be contingently linked -- NCUC  
> support for
> concluding the JPA might be given *only if* continued independent  
> oversight
> is *put in place and in effect* at that moment of JPA conclusion to  
> take
> over.
>
> Inextricably joined at the hip.
>
> So, then the question is what kind of new independent oversight  
> should be
> created.  And, of course, this is the key accountability question.   
> This is
> the horse that must be put before the cart.
>
> Dan
>
> PS -- In this scenario, NCUC should also determine what  
> characteristics a
> new independent oversight structure should have, in order for NCUC to
> support it.  Not just any old oversight structure will be genuinely
> accountable.  What structural characteristics would NCUC require of  
> a new
> system of independent oversight in order to accept such oversight as
> accountable?
>
> There could be a chicken-egg issue here, but I don't know for sure.
>
>
> -- 
> Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author  
> alone and do
> not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]