Robin, Norbert and all:
 
Reading these notes, I think we need to be much clearer with ALAC on what our policy concerns are with respect to fast-track IDN ccTLDs.
 
There are two main concerns:
1) different standards for ccNSO-created IDN TLDs and gNSO-created IDN TLDs. This creates a discriminatory policy environment which might favor one group over the other, or could be gamed by clever participants.
2) competition policy concerns about reinforcing national monopoly registries by giving them one or more new IDNs in advance of new entrants into the market.
 
I did not see those concerns expressed in the ALAC meeting. Hope we can be clearer about this in the future. The first concern has pretty big name space management implications; Avri Doria has expressed a lot of concern about this and I am not sure what her thinking is about how things are going. the second issue is also very important, although those concerns were addressed somewhat by the estimate that country code IDNs might actually take longer to be assigned than generic IDNs. (Why that would be I don't know).
 

Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
http://internetgovernance.org

 


From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting notes from ALAC-NCUC joint meeting in New Delhi


Meeting notes from ALAC-NCUC joint meeting in New Delhi
 (provided by Nick Aston Hart of ICANN)

  https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?summary_minutes_12_february_2008_nc