The GNSO will move toward significantly curtailing domain name tasting (see email below).

There will be a 21-day public comment period now, so please post any thoughts on the below motion.

We should probably update our constituency statement in light of the new motion also.

Robin


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: March 2, 2008 6:32:43 PM PST
To: <[log in to unmask]>, "'Council GNSO'" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [council] Motions re Domain Tasting

The Domain Tasting team has devised the following motion, which effectively
would put the attached substantive motion out for public comments for 21
days and set a timeline for final vote in our April 17 Council meeting.

Whereas, the GNSO Council has discussed the Issues Report on Domain Tasting
and the Final Outcomes Report of the ad hoc group on Domain Tasting;

Whereas, the GNSO Council resolved on 31 October 2007 to launch a PDP on
Domain Tasting and to request Constituency Impact Statements with respect to
issues set forth in the Issues Report and in the Final Outcomes Report;

Whereas, the GNSO Council authorized on 17 January 2008 the formation of a
small design team to develop a plan for the deliberations on the Domain
Tasting PDP (the "Design Team"), the principal volunteers to which had been
members of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and were well-informed of both
the Final Outcomes Report of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and the GNSO
Initial Report on Domain Tasting (collectively with the Issues Report, the
"Reports on Domain Tasting");

Whereas, the Design Team has met and agreed on a Draft Motion [attached] to
be set out for public comment and for Constituency Impact review;

The GNSO Council RESOLVES:

1.    The Draft Motion shall be posted for 21-day public comment on March 7,
2008.  Each Constituency shall have 21 days from March 7, 2008 to update its
Constituency Impact Statement with respect to this motion, if it so chooses.
The deadline for amended Statements shall be March 28, 2008.

2.    ICANN Staff please shall provide a summary of any public comments
and/or amended Constituency Impact Statements to the Council, via submission
of a Final Report with respect to this PDP, by April 4, 2008.

3.    The Design Team shall then meet and confer with respect to the Final
Report, in order to consider any public comments and/or amended Constituency
Impact Statements and to consider any suggested amendments to the Draft
Motion, and shall recommend a Final Motion to be considered by Council for
vote in its scheduled meeting April 17, 2008.

4.    It is the intention of the GNSO for the Staff to produce a Board
Report on this PDP for consideration by the ICANN Board, in the hope that
the Board may vote on any recommendations of the GNSO with respect to this
PDP, at the scheduled ICANN meeting in Paris in June, 2008


 --------------------------------------

Domain Tasting Design Team Motion

Revised - 26 February 2008

 

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council has discussed the Issues Report on Domain Tasting and the Final Outcomes Report of the ad hoc group on Domain Tasting;

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council resolved on 31 October 2007 to launch a PDP on Domain Tasting;

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council authorized on 17 January 2008 the formation of a small design team to develop a plan for the deliberations on the Domain Tasting PDP (the “Design Team”), the principal volunteers to which had been members of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and were well-informed of both the Final Outcomes Report of the Ad Hoc Group on Domain Tasting and the GNSO Initial Report on Domain Tasting (collectively with the Issues Report, the “Reports on Domain Tasting”);

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council has received the Draft Final Report on Domain Tasting;

 

Whereas, PIR, the .org registry operator, has amended its Registry Agreement to charge an Excess Deletion Fee; and both NeuStar, the .biz registry operator, and Afilias, the .info registry operator, are seeking amendments to their respective Registry Agreements to modify the existing AGP;

 

The GNSO Council recommends to the ICANN Board of Directors that:

 

1.     The applicability of the Add Grace Period shall be restricted for any gTLD which has implemented an AGP (“Applicable gTLD Operator”). Specifically, for each Applicable gTLD Operator:

 

a.     During any given month, an Applicable gTLD Operator may not offer any refund for any domain names deleted during the AGP that exceed (i) 10% of its net new registrations in that month (defined as total new registrations less domains deleted during AGP), or (ii) fifty (50) domain names, whichever is greater. 

 

b.     A Registrar may seek an exemption from the application of such restriction in a specific month, upon the documented showing of extraordinary circumstances.  For any Registrar requesting such an exemption, the Registrar must confirm in writing to the Registry Operator how, at the time the names were deleted, these extraordinary circumstances were not known, reasonably could not have been known, and were outside of the Registrar’s control.  Acceptance of any exemption will be at the sole reasonable discretion of the Registry Operator, however "extraordinary circumstances" which reoccur regularly will not be deemed extraordinary.

c.     In addition to all other reporting requirements to ICANN, each Applicable gTLD Operator shall identify each Registrar that has sought an exemption, along with a brief descriptive identification of the type of extraordinary circumstance and the action (if any) that was taken by the Applicable gTLD Operator. 

 

2.     The above restriction on use of the Add Grace Period shall be considered an “ICANN adopted specification or polic[y] prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or speculation in domain names by registrars” in accordance with Section 3.7.9 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement.  As such, a Registrar that engages in domain tasting, defined as using the AGP to register domain names in order to test their profitability, shall be deemed in material breach of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement.

 

3.     Implementation and execution of these recommendations shall be monitored by the GNSO.  Specifically;

 

a.     ICANN Staff shall analyze and report to the GNSO at six month intervals for two years after implementation, until such time as the GNSO resolves otherwise, with the goal of determining;

 

i.               How effectively and to what extent the policies have been implemented and followed by Registries and Registrars, and

 

ii.              Whether or not modifications to these policies should be considered by the GNSO as a result of the experiences gained during the implementation and monitoring stages,

 

b.      The purpose of these monitoring and reporting requirements are to allow the GNSO to determine when, if ever, these recommendations and any ensuing policy require additional clarification or attention based on the results of the reports prepared by ICANN Staff.







IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]