Dear Bill,

As it states, the 6 buckets list was only a template for discussion.  I am not "proposing" this, only that further study and analysis be done about the vision of a fully mature NCSG before setting an inconsistent structure in place.  

I would be happy to engage in discussion with you if you have questions.

Cheryl B. Preston
Edwin M. Thomas
Professor of Law
J. Reuben Clark Law School
Brigham Young University
434 JRCB
Provo, UT 84602
(801) 422-2312
[log in to unmask]

>>> William Drake <[log in to unmask]> 3/5/2009 7:23 am >>>
Cheryl,

Thanks for clarifying your thinking, I was pretty confused in the  
meeting by your prior explanation of how you expected this to work.  I  
would strongly encourage you to file an amendment to your submission  
to the board so that they too will have a better understanding of what  
you are proposing.

Best,

Bill

On Mar 3, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Cheryl Preston wrote:

> I understand there is some confusion about exactly what I had in  
> mind when I mentioned the possibility of a six constituency NCSG  
> model.  This is the exact statement I mentioned.
>
>
> Cheryl B. Preston
> Edwin M. Thomas
> Professor of Law
> J. Reuben Clark Law School
> Brigham Young University
> 434 JRCB
> Provo, UT 84602
> (801) 422-2312
> [log in to unmask]<Tentative Proposals v2.doc>

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
   Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
[log in to unmask]
New book: Governing Global Electronic Networks,
http://tinyurl.com/5mh9jj
***********************************************************