Dear Bill, As it states, the 6 buckets list was only a template for discussion. I am not "proposing" this, only that further study and analysis be done about the vision of a fully mature NCSG before setting an inconsistent structure in place. I would be happy to engage in discussion with you if you have questions. Cheryl B. Preston Edwin M. Thomas Professor of Law J. Reuben Clark Law School Brigham Young University 434 JRCB Provo, UT 84602 (801) 422-2312 [log in to unmask] >>> William Drake <[log in to unmask]> 3/5/2009 7:23 am >>> Cheryl, Thanks for clarifying your thinking, I was pretty confused in the meeting by your prior explanation of how you expected this to work. I would strongly encourage you to file an amendment to your submission to the board so that they too will have a better understanding of what you are proposing. Best, Bill On Mar 3, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Cheryl Preston wrote: > I understand there is some confusion about exactly what I had in > mind when I mentioned the possibility of a six constituency NCSG > model. This is the exact statement I mentioned. > > > Cheryl B. Preston > Edwin M. Thomas > Professor of Law > J. Reuben Clark Law School > Brigham Young University > 434 JRCB > Provo, UT 84602 > (801) 422-2312 > [log in to unmask]<Tentative Proposals v2.doc> *********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland [log in to unmask] New book: Governing Global Electronic Networks, http://tinyurl.com/5mh9jj ***********************************************************