So the "cybersafety" constituency proponents want to bring discussion to ICANN about "Internet safety" and when people start discussing what that means to them the discussion is called "inappropriate" by the proponents of the discussion?
Interesting way of bringing discussion of a subject to a community.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:46 PM, David H Bailey wrote:
This discussion is a bit tiresome, and more than a little bit inappropriate.
Can't we return to answering the questions posed last week in the CSC response to version 6 of the NCUC proposal?
DHB
My position of online safety is that ICANN should only protect against fraud and not free speech. Porn is a slippery slope. If we were to take the Mormon position against porn, do we then take the Catholic position against birth control or condom use? Do we take down criticism of Islam? Do we protect children from "cults". ICANN is not in the law enforcement business. We aren't here to police the Internet - just make it work.