Dear Konstantinos and All,
Tx so much for your comments. I really appreciate them -- and
appreciate Milton posting my comments as I was out of town yesterday.
I don't know many of you, but the debates today are similar to the
debates we held a decade ago (when I served as NCUC's first North
American representative to the Names Council). The Intellectual
Property Constituency, and its many members, see "The Root" as one of
the few places of the Internet that
can be regulated globally. They seek to create entirely new rights
online -- rights that don't exist anywhere in the real world.
They have stopped the creation of large numbers of new gTLDs for many
years -- and I truly hope that cost of opening up the root Will Not
be to give them many extra, new rights -- of the type they are
requesting.
Who will fight the good fight in Sydney? Who will talk to like-minded
registrars and registries -- and they are out there and share our
concerns?
Best and tx for continuing the good work,
Kathy (Kleiman)
[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">Fantastic Kathy – the essence of the new proposal
is the detrimental effect it has upon trademark law and it really sets
new criteria contrary to the way trademark rights have evolved
throughout the years. It is more or less obvious what results the new
gTLD proposal will have upon trademark regimes and I also heard the
rumor that even ICANN themselves are anticipating that the new plan is
going to have a negative impact (50% failure, which is quite high);
however, it will certainly generate more money.
Unfortunately, I won’t be in Sydney to engage in any debate but I will
keep up with the discussions. Does ICANN even take on board these
concerns? Most likely not....
Best
K
On 25/05/2009 23:59, "Mary Wong" <[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I'm glad to see more comments and contributions
from NCUC'ers and like-minded friends on the IRT proposals!
While my take on the IRT report may differ to some extent from some of
you (I'm on the IRT), I think it's important to make those public
comments so that divergent views and alternative proposals can emerge.
The final IRT report will be released toward the end of this week, and
I encourage everyone with an interest in the intersection of trademark
law and domain name policy, as well as those who are concerned about
how the new gTLDs will operate, to track it and comment.
I will be happy to discuss the final report once it's released; there
will also be a public forum at the Sydney meeting that I encourage
everyone who will be there to attend.
Best,
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>> Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]> 5/25/2009 5:50
PM >>>
Wonderful, Kathy! Excellent work!
Thank you,
Robin
On May 25, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Really excellent comments, please read
http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-draft-report/msg00068.html
Shows how the IRT proposals are a power grab that go way beyond
trademark law and ICANN's mission.
Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
http://internetgovernance.org
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org
e: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
--
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
email: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]