It looks much better. In Process Issues when you mention the lack of GNSO involvment it says "there has no GNSO process..." I believe it should be "there has been no GNSO process..." In the section about the CRA recommendations, point to still says "...registrar does not sell second-level domains name subscriptions in the TLDs operated by the registrar" I still believe it should say "TLDs operated by the registry" I guess when you talk about the CRA you are referring at the document that is dated 12Feb09. This is the link of the one I found at ICANN's site: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/regy-regr-separation-18feb09-en.pdf Is there any other version of the report ? Perhaps it could be useful to add a concrete reference/link to the report. Also, in the proposed model in the CRA report (the one I pointed to) there is an exception where a registrar should be able to sell names from the affiliated registry up to a given threshold. Am I reading the same report ? and what model do we support ? My .02 Regards Jorge