Hi, Makes sense. the policy stuff will be needed when, and if, it is time for constituency statements. a. On 28 Aug 2009, at 14:05, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > Hello, all > I've gotten some feedback from external stakeholders on our statement. > This made it clear to me that the section on "policy issues" is > something of a distraction to what our main point needs to be at > this time. People who agree or disagree with those points tend to > get stuck in that and lose sight of the recommendations, especially > the all-important one that we need to have a policy process. Once we > have a real policy process, we can debate and discuss the policy > issues and take positions as NCUC; but it is needless to do that now. > > For that reason I offer this modified, and I hope final version, > which simply eliminates the section formerly headlines as "Policy > issues" and emphasizes the need to treat this as a policy issue and > move the PDP process forward in the GNSO. > > <word doc attached> > > Milton Mueller > Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies > XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology > ------------------------------ > Internet Governance Project: > http://internetgovernance.org > <NCUC-verticalRY-Rr-final.doc>