On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Adam Peake wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As Milton is not currently the chair or in an official role for >> NCUC (I don't think), I am not sure why NCUC needs to repudiate him. >> >> I am sure we all don't agree with what any of us writes and am not >> sure that we need to write a repudiation every time someone says >> something the NCUC doesn't agree with. I would not expect the NCUC >> was reading everything I wrote in my blog and deciding whether they >> agreed with me or not or whether they needed to publicly rebuke me. >> >> Not making any personal comment on the content of this yet, since I >> have not done the research. >> >> I would also be surprised and disappointed if anyone were to take >> his personal words and his personal blog , whatever their >> characteristics, as a cause for action against the NCUC. > > > Unfortunately, people do associate Milton with NCUC. And as changing > such perceptions is hard, it's best to just say he doesn't speak for > us. > > And the post, in its substantive parts, does read like an NCUC > position. I think Avri's reply on the blog addresses this well. BIll