I agree that more due diligence is needed. Best, David S. Olson Assistant Professor BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL 885 Centre St., Newton, MA 02459 tel: 617- 552-1378 fax: 617-552-4098 [log in to unmask] On Sep 29, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote: > FYI, be careful if you visit the rds.hn site since it seems it has > been hacked > at some time, and it has trojans and other stuff: > http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=rds.hn > > About the statement Milton is right to point out that that > particular statement > came from LACTLD and not RDS. > > Getting involved with ccTLDs is a tricky situation and before we > make any > "official" statement we should find out more directly from the RDS > people > and also hear the other side of the story. > > No doubt any move to takeover the ccTLD administration in the way > it has > been reported is not a desirable/preferred way of doing things, but > we don't > know if this is an ongoing conflict since the HN Telecom Act of > 2002 and > the reasons why RDS didn't enter into a formal agreement with CONATEL. > > I'll recommend we do some due diligence before making any statement > from > the NCUC. > > Regards > Jorge > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: >> Since many GAC members believe that governments should have a >> right to assert control over the ccTLD at will, I am not sure they >> are the best ones to take up this cause. >> >> However, I think this is a very important development and would >> favor having NCUC sign on to the LACTLD statement, or develop one >> of our own. >> >> --MM