Jorge, You're very welcome, I'm glad it worked out for you, and thanks for the feedback. I'm going to forward your comment on to folks I work with at the Internet Governance Project that deal with Elluminate (and know far more about it than I do). I'm sure something can be done to improve the audio if/when that tool is used. Best, Brenden On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > First of all, big thanks for the extra effort to enable remote > participation, and > particularly to Brenden that was very helpful letting us keep track of what > was going on in the room and who was speaking. > > On this side didn't have any major issues with the Elluminate application > but for some reason the quality of the audio was not comparable to the > experience with Acrobat Connect or the Audiocast the ALAC folks are > using. > > There was a high level of ambient noise and obviously it was more easy to > hear those that were close to the microphone, so thanks for asking several > times for people to remember to use it. > > Some voices were easy to recognize, Robin, Avri, Debra, and Milton > (may be because they are the more noisy ones :-), for following meetings > I guess it could be a good practice, at least during the first hour or two > of the meeting, to say your names before you speak so we can train > our ears to recognize the voices. > > To be frank there was some portions of the meeting I was not able to > follow, but I'd say I've got 70-80-% of the discussions/presentations. > > There is one subject for which I provided some comments via chat > regarding how to build better relationships with other constituencies > particularly with ALAC, but I'll spare this topic for a separate email. > > Hope you all had a great time at the gala, I've seen few pictures and > the setup looked impressive. > > Getting ready now for the start of another interesting remote participation > day at ICANN 36. > > Thanks again & Regards > Jorge > >