Hello Leslie, That is fantastic. The chinese perspective is important – especially the lessons from the dispute resolution system concerning .cn – also in relation to the clearinghouse. You will bring another perspective to the group and this is very important. Konstantinos On 22/10/2009 03:56, "asmartlawyer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Dear All, > > How are you? > This is Leslie, one of ICANN Seoul Fellows, I have an interest to work on > trademark issues for NCUC in the new gtld policy that ICANN is developing. I'm > well content to apply for volunteering to represent NCUC to participate on a > GNSO Work Team on"special trademark issues"that remain unresolved from the IRT > Report. I want to give my opinion on Trademark Clearinghouse in the > perspective of comparative studies on China trademark law and Common Law > trademark rights. I hope I can help, and I am looking forward to seeing all of > you in Seoul!! > > Warm regards, > Leslie (Guan Yuanyuan) > China > > > > > > Dear All, > > It looks like the new GNSO group to deal with "special trademark issues" > (formerly known as "IRT") is getting up and running. It also looks like each > constituency will appoint 2-3 people to serve on this group and that much of > its work will be done in Seoul next week. > > http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07701.html > http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07709.html > > We should begin to formulate our constituency response as soon as possible. > > I understand there are a number of changes in the trademark policies in the > DAGv3 from previous versions. Now it is in the hands of the GNSO members > until 14 December to work through the unresolved issues. This will be an > important topic at the GNSO sessions on the weekend, so we should try to have > our position formulated before then to the extent possible. We will spend > some time on Constituency Day discussing these issues, but that is too late to > be useful for participants in the weekend sessions. > > It would be very helpful if those members of the constituency who have > reviewed the new DAG v3 could provide the rest of us with some guidance on how > NCUC should respond moving forward in light of the Board's letter to the GNSO. > > Especially those who would like to represent NCUC in this new GNSO work group, > can you please provide us with some understanding of what the issues are that > remain and what NCUC's position should be on those issues? > > Thank you very much! > > Best, > Robin > > > IP JUSTICE > Robin Gross, Executive Director > 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA > p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 > w: http://www.ipjustice.org <http://www.ipjustice.org/> e: > [log in to unmask] > > > > > "雪见"杨幂邀你共品3D国韵网游《天下贰》,海报免费领 > <http://allyes.nie.163.com/main/adfclick?db=afanie&bid=1258,613,23&cid=147,4,1 > &sid=1355&show=ignore&url=http://tx2.163.com/fab.html> -- Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis, Lecturer in Law, GigaNet Membership Chair, University of Strathclyde, The Lord Hope Building, 141 St. James Road, Glasgow, G4 0LT, UK tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306 email: [log in to unmask]