On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > You will also find some discussion in the proposed registry contract > section 2.9: > > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-agreement-specs-clean-04oct09-en.pdf > > (BTW: I have been told that this is worth reviewing for lots of reasons - > and that those among us who are contract savvy could find lots f things to > comment on in this document) > > Agree, there is a lot to be concerned about. I wrote about Specification 6, particularly requirements for implementing protocols that do not have wide acceptance in the market, here: http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/1/8/4421904.html > > a. > >