Here just trying to manage your 'CEO responses expectations.' I attended the CEO Roundtable at Seoul. The first thing was 'setting of the ground rules' - its an opportunity for the CEO directly interact and hear the views of 'off-the-street' Internet community member. One is free to say pretty much *anything* since nothing was to leave that room. It's great that David asked for question tips but I doubt he'll be in a position to post responses on the list :( kindly, Alex On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > If you go straight with the triple X theme Rod will get out of the bag > the politically correct answer, I guess we have to be more clever and > ask if he supports the independent review process and how he thinks > the board has to act given that as far as I know the review process is > not binding. > > My .02 > Jorge > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Konstantinos has provided a better way of asking the question I was trying to ask with my second question. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> David, I would also add to any questions on the new gTLDs, whether he >>> believes that the trademark protection issue can now be considered >>> resolved after the work of the STI. Whether after the last public >>> comment period and the acceptance of the STI's work, trademark >>> protection is no longer an issue nor will it be resuscitated in the >>> future. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC- >>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller >>> >>> You could also ask whether he thinks it's a good idea to allow powerful >>> interest groups keep trying to re-write the policies governing the new >>> gTLD introduction. >>> >> >