YES YES YES!

Thank you for understanding what I'm talking about.

Nuno Garcia wrote:
> Excelent point, fully agree. From a technological point of view, the 
> differences for managing ibm.com <http://ibm.com> and for managing 
> .ibm should be close to zero.
>
> Yet, if you want to resell... that's a totally new scenario...
>
> BR
>
> Nuno Garcia
>
> 2010/3/18 Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>
>
>     Avri Doria wrote:
>>     On 18 Mar 2010, at 16:29, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>       
>>>     So - if the root servers referred .reality to my servers then it would be fully operational.
>>>         
>>     and if you met all of the other conditions in the DAG and paid your 185 KUSD then it might, until then, it is a plaything.
>>
>>     remember, we are talking about reality here and not your religious belief in a world without IANA.
>>
>>     a.
>>       
>
>     My point however is that as a private TLD the other conditions are
>     not necessary. Those conditrion only are necessary if you are
>     selling subdomains of the TLD.
>
>     What I'm suggesting is that IBM controls everything under ibm.com
>     <http://ibm.com>. This would allow IBM to control everything under
>     .ibm
>
>