While I agree that the consumer interest group (and broader relationship with the proposed consumers constituency) issue is important to us and should be discussed, I think the discussion should take place within the broader context of "where, when and how the Board sees the progress towards a final charter going".
In addition, we could (if time permits) engage the Board in other issues of some importance to our group and the non-commercial community, e.g. ensuring adequate representation on each of the AoC Review Teams and the difficulties/need for support (financial and staff) for even more outreach activities.
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>>
I agree - just the consumer agenda from me. On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the relevance to consumer etc > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during our Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15. >> >> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can send them beforehand. >> >> Suggestions? >> >> thanks >> >> a. >> >
|