I agree with Mary that you shouldn’t tag the agenda to something
as narrow as SIGs. The NCSG charter progress is the key issue, and the Consumer
constituency and IGs within NCSG can be covered within that framework.
From: Non-Commercial User
Constituency [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mary
Wong
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.
While I agree that
the consumer interest group (and broader relationship with the proposed
consumers constituency) issue is important to us and should be discussed, I
think the discussion should take place within the broader context of
"where, when and how the Board sees the progress towards a final charter
going".
In addition, we
could (if time permits) engage the Board in other issues of some importance to
our group and the non-commercial community, e.g. ensuring adequate
representation on each of the AoC Review Teams and the difficulties/need for
support (financial and staff) for even more outreach activities.
Cheers
Mary
Mary W
S Wong
Professor of Law
& Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law
Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: [log in to unmask]
Phone:
1-603-513-5143
Selected
writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
I agree - just
the consumer agenda from me. |