This seems reasonable tactics. enviado via iPhone On 06/03/2010, at 15:33, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I agree with Mary that you shouldn’t tag the agenda to something as > narrow as SIGs. The NCSG charter progress is the key issue, and the > Consumer constituency and IGs within NCSG can be covered within that > framework. > > > > From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC- > [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mary Wong > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:30 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN > Board. > > > While I agree that the consumer interest group (and broader > relationship with the proposed consumers constituency) issue is > important to us and should be discussed, I think the discussion > should take place within the broader context of "where, when and how > the Board sees the progress towards a final charter going". > > In addition, we could (if time permits) engage the Board in other > issues of some importance to our group and the non-commercial > community, e.g. ensuring adequate representation on each of the AoC > Review Teams and the difficulties/need for support (financial and > staff) for even more outreach activities. > > Cheers > Mary > > Mary W S Wong > Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs > Franklin Pierce Law Center > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: [log in to unmask] > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network > (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 > > > >>> > From: > Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> > To: > <[log in to unmask]> > Date: > 3/6/2010 7:16 AM > Subject: > Re: [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board. > I agree - just the consumer agenda from me. > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group > approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the > relevance to consumer etc > > > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during > our Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15. > >> > >> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can > send them beforehand. > >> > >> Suggestions? > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> a. > >> > > >