Of course, I suppose that we all suggesting different issues for amalgamation then consideration if, which, how and who to raise them with Board.. On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William Drake < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > I didn't mean talk about interest groups out of the context of the larger > framework, so we are on the same page. > > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > I agree with Mary that you shouldn’t tag the agenda to something as narrow > as SIGs. The NCSG charter progress is the key issue, and the Consumer > constituency and IGs within NCSG can be covered within that framework. > > > *From:* Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong > *Sent:* Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:30 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board. > > > While I agree that the consumer interest group (and broader relationship > with the proposed consumers constituency) issue is important to us and > should be discussed, I think the discussion should take place within the > broader context of "where, when and how the Board sees the progress towards > a final charter going". > > In addition, we could (if time permits) engage the Board in other issues of > some importance to our group and the non-commercial community, e.g. ensuring > adequate representation on each of the AoC Review Teams and the > difficulties/need for support (financial and staff) for even more outreach > activities. > > Cheers > Mary > > *Mary W S Wong* > Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs > Franklin Pierce Law Center > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: [log in to unmask] > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) > at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 > > > >>> > *From:* > Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> > *To:* > <[log in to unmask]> > *Date:* > 3/6/2010 7:16 AM > *Subject:* > Re: [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board. > I agree - just the consumer agenda from me. > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group > approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the relevance > to consumer etc > > > > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during our > Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15. > >> > >> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can send > them beforehand. > >> > >> Suggestions? > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> a. > >> > > > > > > *********************************************************** > William J. Drake > Senior Associate > Centre for International Governance > Graduate Institute of International and > Development Studies > Geneva, Switzerland > [log in to unmask] > www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html > *********************************************************** > >