I agree, and preferably a review team member with our best interests at heart.. On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Even if for some valid reason confidentiality is required, 1 or more > members of the review team should be included in the distribution of > such documents with the premise to act only as observers and keep the > contents and matters absolutely confidential, that will guarantee more > transparency even if secrecy for a delicate matter is necessary. > > My .02 > Jorge > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following is the final version we reached in Nairobi. > > > > I have just sent a note to Cheryl asking what comes next. > > > > a. >