I agree, and preferably a review team member with our best interests at
heart..

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Even if for some valid reason confidentiality is required, 1 or more
> members of the review team should be included in the distribution of
> such documents with the premise to act only as observers and keep the
> contents and matters absolutely confidential, that will guarantee more
> transparency even if secrecy for a delicate matter is necessary.
>
> My .02
> Jorge
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following is the final version we reached in Nairobi.
> >
> > I have just sent a note to Cheryl asking what comes next.
> >
> > a.
>