All On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Milton, et all, > > While I support the general idea and the spirit of the comments I feel > that there is too much extra cheese for the nachos talking about what > ICANN should be or not should be and what the BoD should do and not > should do, I strongly believe that we should cut to the cheese and > simply say that ICANN must follow its processes developed by its > constituencies and accept the outcome of the IRP as the safeguard for > accountability. > > IMHO, going on and on with the XXX, pornography, and free speech song, > it's what keeps the "content" or "nature" of the TLD on everybody's > minds and fuels the public discussion pushing it away from what's the > core issue here. I agree with Jorge on all of the above. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel