Rafik
That’s good! Just wanted to make sure we
cover this base
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair
Managing Director, ATUG
Chairman, INTUG
T: +61 2 94958901
F: +61 2 94193889
M: +61 413734490
Skype: rasinclair
Please visit the ATUG website
for Updates and Information www.atug.com.au
From: Rafik Dammak
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:16
PM
To: Rosemary Sinclair
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sinclair comments -
Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter
Hi Rosemary,
about resourcing Interest Groups, I think that there is no need
for commitment from the Board as the toolkit document drafted by the
OSC CSG WT and which was approved by the GNSO council intent to provide needed
resources for Groups. The ICANN staff is working now on the implementation ( I
asked about that few weeks ago).
Regards
Rafik
2010/5/3 Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Hi Avri
I am happy to go with consensus - my only purpose was to provide you with some
input based on my views
The highlighting was just to point to the specific words that caused me to
comment
My point on Constituencies is an administrative one - and if Board is happy for
NCSG to have only Interest Groups then I suggest we ask the Board to commit to
resourcing Interest Groups eg the discussion on face to face mtgs of some
months ago
I'm happy to provide more info on any point that might be unclear
Cheers
Rosemary
Sent from
my BlackBerry® from Optus
From: "
Date: Mon, 3 May
2010 13:45:52 +1000
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re:
Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter
Hi,
I have read through your extensive edits and on first reading, I have a
question and a comment:
- the question: I do not understand why you have highlighted section in
yellow. do you mean that the charter should have these things
highlighted.
- On the question of constituencies.
The board has already approved two Stakeholder Groups charters that do not have
constituencies. As I understood our conversations with the
SIC and the Board they are not requiring constituencies so long as we have a
clear charter and we explain the decisions we have made. This
is the purpose of the cover letter which is still being worked.
Yours is the first call I have seen from within the NCSG for us to continue
with formal constituencies and I do not know if there is any other support for
it with the NCSG membership.
At this point unless I see strong support from the members, I do not think it
is something we should change.
I will look through the rest of your proposed edits in detail.
a.
On 2 May 2010, at 22:31, Rosemary Sinclair wrote:
> Hi Avri and everyone
>
> Some thoughts for discussion
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
>
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Managing Director, ATUG
> Chairman, INTUG
> T: +61 2 94958901 F: +61 2 94193889
> M: +61 413734490
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Skype: rasinclair