Hi, I have read through your extensive edits and on first reading, I have a question and a comment: - the question: I do not understand why you have highlighted section in yellow. do you mean that the charter should have these things highlighted. - On the question of constituencies. The board has already approved two Stakeholder Groups charters that do not have constituencies. As I understood our conversations with the SIC and the Board they are not requiring constituencies so long as we have a clear charter and we explain the decisions we have made. This is the purpose of the cover letter which is still being worked. Yours is the first call I have seen from within the NCSG for us to continue with formal constituencies and I do not know if there is any other support for it with the NCSG membership. At this point unless I see strong support from the members, I do not think it is something we should change. I will look through the rest of your proposed edits in detail. a. On 2 May 2010, at 22:31, Rosemary Sinclair wrote: > Hi Avri and everyone > > Some thoughts for discussion > > Cheers > > Rosemary > > Rosemary Sinclair > Managing Director, ATUG > Chairman, INTUG > T: +61 2 94958901 F: +61 2 94193889 > M: +61 413734490 > Email: [log in to unmask] > Skype: rasinclair