I have just read the transcript of the panel "Law Enforcement Amendments to the RAA ", held on 21 June, 2010 during the Brussels ICANN meeting. The panel was chaired by ALAC's Cheryl Langdon-Orr. Everyone seemed to be sort of happy of sharing a discussion room full of police :) I do not understand the role law enforcers are supposed to play in defining ICANN policies. Law enforcers such as the FBI, Interpol etc work on a very simple paradigm: they follow orders, and the more information they get, the better to fulfill the orders they ought to follow. So they will always defend the idea that all private data should be recorded and made available to them whenever they deem necessary. It simply makes their job easier, and this is enough for them, and is all we will hear from them, whatever the nice dressing of their discourses. However, ICANN should be looking for appropriate policies which abide by internationally recognized human rights principles. This is the realm of legislators, policy-makers, regulators -- not law enforcers -- and these are the organizations ICANN should be talking to in deciding policies regarding balancing privacy rights with security. If decisions regarding the users' / consumers' rights to privacy are going to be taken on the advice of the police, I do not think we will arrive at a good end of this story. --c.a.