Yes - I have to object as well. ICANN is not a law enforcement agency and should not see itself as policing the Internet. This would be like telling the phone company that they are a branch of law enforcement and can listen in on phone calls. Or having utility copmanies spying on their customers for law enforcement. Or having priests turn people in to law enforcement.

I don't see where law enforcement has a role to play in ICANN at all.

On 7/27/2010 2:53 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">Why is ICANN specifically trying to stack the deck of this Whois group with "law enforcement representatives"?

When did the community agree to specify it wanted "law enforcement" in this group (rather than privacy commissioners, for example)?

Obviously this is an attempt to create a specific outcome in line with the many requests for more personal information that we've seen coming from law enforcement & IPR collaborations lately (full-court press in Brussels).

Ironically, this notice itself is an example of the kind of staff manipulation to create desired policy outcomes that the Accountability and Transparency Review Teams need to hear about in the first place.

Robin


Begin forwarded message:

From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
Date: July 27, 2010 6:01:52 AM PDT
To: liaison6c <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [liaison6c] Call for Independent Experts, Law Enforcement Representatives and Global Policy Experts - WHOIS Policy Review (AoC)



http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-26jul10-en.htm
Call for Independent Experts, Law Enforcement Representatives and Global Policy Experts - WHOIS Policy Review (AoC)

26 July 2010

Deadline: 6 September 2010 - 23:59 UTC

The Affirmation of Commitments calls for a periodic review of four key ICANN objectives, namely:

Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users; 
Preserving security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; 
Promoting competition, consumer trust and consumer choice; 
WHOIS policy. 
In line with the Affirmation provisions, the WHOIS Policy Review (WIR) is to be objectively performed by a Review Team composed of:

Volunteer Community Members representing the relevant Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees of ICANN; 
ICANN CEO (or designated nominee); 
GAC Chair (or designated nominee); 
Representatives of Law Enforcement 
Global Policy Experts; and 
Independent experts. 
The composition of this Review Team shall be jointly determined by the CEO of ICANN - Mr. Rod Beckstrom - and Chair of the GAC - Mrs. Heather Dryden (in consultation with GAC Members).

Whereas a Call for Applicants for volunteer RT Members was launched on June 1, ICANN now invites interested individuals to apply for a position of Independent Expert, Law Enforcement Representative or Global Policy Expert on the WHOIS Policy Review Team.

Please refer to the WHOIS Policy Review - Call for Independent Experts, Law Enforcement Representatives and Global Policy Experts, Details [PDF, 92 KB] for further information and instructions on the application process.

An extensive expertise in the subject under review as well as an ability to remain fully independent and objective constitute highly desired requirements for a valid application.

Interested candidates, please submit your CV, letter of motivation to [log in to unmask] by 6 September 2010 - 23:59 UTC. Relevant experience should be clearly stated.


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
[log in to unmask]
http://gnso.icann.org






IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]