Hi, I believe the Policy-committee could make the decision to endorse if they had a consensus, especially if no one on the public lists has objections. I am fine with being a signatory to your third option. a. On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:11, Mary Wong wrote: > I echo Avri's thanks, Debbie, and agree that NCSG should discuss whether it can support and endorse the comments submitted by the Red Cross. > > Speaking personally, I would be happy to. > > In view of the fact that today is the last day, I guess the group's options are: > - Endorse in full (if sufficient members can agree) as an SG > - Endorse in part as an SG > - Endorsement (either in full or in part) by a group of members (starting with Avri, me and whoever else wants to sign on) identifying ourselves as NCSG members (or as non-commercial interests) > - No endorsement of any kind > > It may be that the third option would be the quickest and easiest. > > Cheers > Mary > > Mary W S Wong > Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs > Franklin Pierce Law Center > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: [log in to unmask] > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 > > > >>> > From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Date: 8/12/2010 11:23 AM > Subject: Re: American Red Cross' Comments on Initial Report on Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries > On 12 Aug 2010, at 09:39, Debra Hughes wrote: > > > <American Red Cross Comments to VI Report - 08122010.pdf> > > > Hi, > > Thanks for writing and sending this. Having just read it, I am wondering whether this is a comment that the NCSG would be willing to endorse? > > Personally, and as a member of the VIWG, I ver much appreciate this comment and do hope we can endorse it. > > Are any other comments in the offing? > > Today is the deadline. > > thanks > > a. > > >