Is it the URL or the actual web page you are talking about? > -----Original Message----- > From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Avri Doria > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:52 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] more news on ICANN Ombudsman Frank > Fowlie's air rage incident & cover-up attempt > > Hi, > > No. > > But it could be tracked as a electronic communication transactional > record and if this list ever advocated 'mutiny' or some other dastardly > deed, you could be linked to it. > > a. > > On 4 Aug 2010, at 12:41, Jorge Amodio wrote: > > >>> The F.B.I. contends that the e-mail addresses to which people send > >>> messages, and the Web pages they visit, are the functional > equivalent of the > >>> phone numbers they call. Officials familiar with the matter, > speaking > >>> anonymously because of the sensitivity of the issue, say that most > companies > >>> agree with that interpretation and have routinely turned over such > records > >>> when requested. > >> > >> The web pages people visit: "the functional equivalent of the phone > numbers > >> they call"?!? > > > > So if you send a message to an electronic mail list like this one is > > it considered some sort of mutiny ? > > > > Regards > > Jorge