Greetings, We could really do with an NCUC/SG comment to PDP-WT. All others have commented except us. This is to only to support Avri's appeal on this. thanks. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > Once again in a PDP meeting. Once again asked it thee would be a comment > from the NCSG. > > Comment period close 30 September. For real this time. Enough extensions > already. > > We still do not have a volunteer to actually do a report. Lots of people > have volunteered to review one, but someone has to do the initial work. > Alex and I are parts of the group so I do not feel we can take the lead. > > I still think this is a critical piece of policy process we really should > review as a SG. > > I entreat you all, please take a look at: > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report > > and comment. Please also let me/the_list if you are doing this. > > Thanks > > a. > > > > On 2 Sep 2010, at 10:05, Avri Doria wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am sitting in the PDP work team meeting and was asked whether we intend > to submit a review to the new PDP processes. > > > > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report > > > > Is anyone willing? The deadline has been moved for one last extension to > Sept 30. > > > > BTW: I am on the WT and thus even if I wanted to comment, i don't believe > I should be the one to do so. i tend to believe that those in a group have > enough opportunity to make their points and comments should be generated by > others. I think this stuff s important to NCSG since that is how all of the > policy gets made and these changes may have an effect on how we work. > > > > a. > > > > > > ---- > Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy > -- regards, Alex Gakuru http://www.mwenyeji.com Hosting, surprise yourself!