> So was it ICANN that actually did the seizing? ICANN has no operational knobs it can tweak at the 2nd+ level. Verisign does. I'd really like if some of the numerous reports citing a Court order provide more information about it or a link, so far I'm still trying to find a concrete reference or the actual order. Both the .com (supposedly seized) and the .info (still working) are registered by the same person with address in Egypt. Regards Jorge