That's 100% correct, I've seen multiple posts/messages/tweets circulating wrong information about this bill that is not even close to become a law, that still has to pass the house of representatives whack-a-mole process and get back to the full senate floor/commission, something very unlikely to happen during the lame duck session. There are obviously some parts of the bill that are of major concern for the Internet community, but talking about censorship, limiting freedom of expression, breaking or fragmenting the Internet is not the appropriate approach IMHO to lobby for changes in the bill or to kill it all (something that as Milton already said is highly probable to happen). Please read the bill, read the analysis and educated comments, then tweet and generate waves, right now the information I'm seeing circulating in various channels is 99% bogus, including the US joining Iran and China in the censorship clan of the Internet. Please lets focus and reduce the noise/signal ratio. My .02 Jorge On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Correction: One Committee of one House of a bicameral legislature has > approved it. ;-) > > It must also go through the committee process in the House and that isn’t > even started. > > People in DC think the tide is turning against this bill. > > --MM