Looking forward to hearing from Rosemary. Amber Sterling Senior Intellectual Property Specialist Association of American Medical Colleges -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:56 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: NPOC charter update Dear Amber, Thanks. I ask Rosemary, the NCSG-EC vice chair, who has taken the lead on membership issue to get back to you. I remember that in at least one case there as question about the make up of the membership of the organization. And that while the group applying was not-for-profit, it was a aggregation of associations some of which appeared to have a for-profit orientation. We had left it as a case for more investigation, and stalled at that point. And for that I reiterate my regrets - as my only defense, I have tended to get bogged down in the charter issues. I do not remember the details off-hand, so hopefully Rosemary can get back to you with the details and can follow through. Best Regards, a. On 2 Nov 2010, at 10:39, Amber Sterling wrote: > Hi Avri, > > Please send any questions you or the EC may have regarding the > perspective members to me as each organization meets (my understanding > of) the NCSG membership requirements. > > Kind regards, > Amber > > Amber Sterling > Senior Intellectual Property Specialist > Association of American Medical Colleges > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Avri Doria > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:59 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: NPOC charter update > > On 1 Nov 2010, at 19:43, Amber Sterling wrote: > >> Additionally, Debbie >> and I brought 6 new perspective members to the NCSG in May 2010; their >> applications are still pending. > > > For this I must apologize. The NCSG-EC did put in a process for > handling it, but on several of these we got down and never reached the > unanimous approval required and got bogged down waiting for the next > step. > > I have copied the NCSG-EC list on this one in the hope that we do get > this back on the track. Your applications was easy since no one had any > issues, but on the others, there were questions that needed to be > followed up that I don't think ever were. > > I can't offer any explanation other than the focus has been so much on > the getting the charter through, little else has happened in the EC. > > a. >