It is a good point. One of the problems with stakeholder categories is the way they overlap and can be gamed to over-represent some interests at the expense of others. > -----Original Message----- > > just for clarification, I'm not interested in the "person", just the > "office" being represented by the person. > > Just trying to understand and learn what interests lay in ICANN's > governance behind the intellectual property administration of the AAMC > and how that particular constituency is or not being represented > within the current ICANN sctructure. >