On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could produce a short support statement that says we support the points, but that we do not accept further delay of the program and suggest that issues re remedied within the next 60 days.
>
> or something similar.

+1.

Not 100% sure I agree with the entire ALAC statement, but it is really
concerning that several items magically landed and/or got twisted in
the process of going from the DAG to the PAG.

Regards
Jorge