Hello, till now it is just a proposal benefiting the hype of domain seizure. we should be more interested if there is at least proof-of-concept or beta version not just statement and making PR in twitter and different blog where there is no really any indication about the technology. I am cautious after example like Haystack supposed to be THE secure circumvention tool. Rafik 2010/12/1 Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> > I have to agree. I think that the technology to develop a name server > system that no one government can control is worthwhile even if it is never > deployed. We should at least know how to do it and have that be out there so > that if the powers that exist now keep crossing lines that shouldn't be > crossed then the people can switch them offf rather than them switching us > off. > > > On 12/1/2010 4:53 AM, Nuno Garcia wrote: > > I would joint this endeavour without second thoughts... > > I am not an anarchist (on the contrary), but it has become increasingly > clear that the entities that rule current Internet namespace are more part > of the problem than part of the solution... > > And besides, there is space to create an alternative DNS root server > infrastructure (maybe a superset of this). I haven't given this much > thought, though... > > On 1 December 2010 11:28, Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Former Pirate Bay's Peter Sunde attempting to create p2p alternative >> to ICANN: >> http://www.geek.com/articles/news/peter-sunde-attempting-to-create-p2p-alternative-to-icann-20101129/ >> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM, DeeDee Halleck <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/71-71/4099-sinking-the-online-pirates >> > -DeeDee >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.blogspot.com >> > >> http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=0&msid=109520517858965396132.00048838d78b7d003adb8 >> > >> > >> > >> > >