On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:16 PM, I received an email from Waleed
GadElkareem, the owner of the domain name torrent-finder.com stating:

"I have signed an engagement letter with David Snead http://www.dsnead.com/
. Hopefully I can get a fast legal action.

I'll update you if I got any further news.

Best, waleed"

 

Waleed read a statement by David Snead on
http://www.thewhir.com/blog/David_Snead/112910_Torrent_Finder_and_the_IPR_Ce
nter, and decided to contact him.

 

If anyone has any insight and would like to share on this action (or on
David Snead himself) that I can pass along to him, or if you would like to
contact Waleed directly at [log in to unmask], I'm sure he would appreciate
it.

 

Amr Elsadr M.D.

Chief Operating Officer

Tele-Med International

 <http://www.telemedint.net/> http://www.telemedint.net

Tel: +2(023)534-6098

Fax: +2(023)534-6029

 

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Joly MacFie
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and More

 

I just videotaped a  Copyright Society of the USA discussion on Viacom vs
Google.

http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1487

The Tiffany case was cited more than once

 

Cliff Sloan of Skadden Arps went so far as to suggest that whenever there is
a pattern of infringement RICO should be invoked...

 

j

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

More info but still no link to Court order ...


http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/the-background-dope-on-dhs-recen
t-seizure-of-domains/

Regards
Jorge

 

Lucky eBay!! - theirs is accorded all due process. This a demonstration of
future of legal double standards and/or transparent due process?

- - - - 

Title: Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay

Docket:
<http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-300.htm>
10-300
Issue(s): Whether, under the doctrine of contributory trademark
infringement, a defendant can be held liable for operating a marketplace
that it knows is used to sell substantial quantities of goods that infringe
a plaintiff's trademark, even if it does not know that particular goods are
infringing.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-11-23-10/




-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
  Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------