[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">I was particularly fond of the expressions "loose
nuts" and "another troll".
Of course I don't take it personally Jorge, but you should
know to choose your words better.
The "it has been attempted before", or the "it's never going
to work" attitude is poison to innovation, creativite and
moreover, it is poison to participation.
So please, I ask you to refrain from such attitutes. Their bad
for our collective health.
Please note that I', not questioning how valid your arguments
may be (I'm pretty sure you feel you ought to say something out
of your vaste experience).
Poor choice of words, poor attitude, maybe you're having a
bad day? No sweat, it happens to all of us.
Kind regards,
Nuno Garcia
On 1 December 2010 17:05, Jorge Amodio
<[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
Besides few loose nuts out there that have been trying to do
the same
thing for two decades, there is no real incentive (meaning
money) for
a $7B+ industry to change its ecosystem and pay attention to
another
troll.
The technology to have/use an alternate dns root exists and
is
available to anybody, you just need to convince couple of
hundred
million users and service providers to point to your own
servers, and
then we can make a movie about the fights that will surface
when
people try to determine who runs the servers and how and
who/how you
pay to keep it running.
Again, what we need is something better and more elaborated
that an
alternate root, a new scheme that enables applications to
locate
resources using a protocol and name space that is not tied
to the
current DNS.
My .02
Jorge