I find myself in complete agreement with the ALAC statement on the crucial issues of the DRSP, the Independent Objector and the illegitimate role of the staff in setting policy. I cannot fathom why Wendy would want to approve the AG without modifications. Can you explain? --MM > -----Original Message----- > From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Wendy Seltzer > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:36 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: ALAC comment on the Proposed > Applicant Guidebook > > I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent. > > In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must > regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to > be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet > end-users." I would urge the approval of the AG now. > > --Wendy > > On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote: > > > > Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement. > > > > They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness > to come in and speak to us. > > > >> > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draf > t+Final+Applicant+Guidebook > > > > a. > > > > > > > > > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613 > Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy > Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University > http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html > http://www.chillingeffects.org/ > https://www.torproject.org/donate << please donate! > http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/