I've been having trouble understanding the general opinion on this. What is wrong with more TLD?????? This, to me, is good PER SE. This guy (Morris) goes on and on about how .xxx it won't change anything, but, why would it have to change anything????

Tim Berners-Lee once made a similar argument to me and after some back and forth he was forced to admit that his view was largely aesthetic.

I'm one to give a whole bunch of consideration to aesthetically-grounded points. But for the life of me, i cannot see how technical people find TLD expansion inaesthetic.

Nicolas

On 21/03/2011 4:06 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Same old arguments we’ve heard thousands of times before. Where has he been? It’s sad that so many technical people think that they have a God-given right to impose their own idiosyncratic notions of what names are allowable on the rest of us. Tim Berners-Lee once made a similar argument to me and after some back and forth he was forced to admit that his view was largely aesthetic. He didn’t think it was nice to “clutter up” the Top level. So BFD, Tim and Tom, a distributed, decentralized medium evolves in messy ways – love it or leave it.

 

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of DeeDee Halleck
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 3:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Tom Morris takes on xxx

 

http://blog.tommorris.org/post/3968125126/tel-xxx-and-mobi-are-all-pointless-and-idiotic

read the comments too!

dd

 


--

http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org