[log in to unmask]" type="cite">On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
He has one point I agree with. Why should .XXX cost more than .COM ?
Why not?
They certainly have higher costs in terms of diligence. And they do have years of litigation to recoup, and, um, I think there are few more .com registrations.
One comment in another thread made me chuckle about the irony of the phrase "intellelctual property" when applied to smut.
BTW I have posted an illustrated version of the board vote at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YidaDxIH_8I