Dear Avri, KK, Robin, Mary, and all The proposed Consumer Constituency's (draft) charter principally reinforces our parent NCUC/SG policy positions - i.e. neither opposed nor silence. This thinking leads me to state that we (CC) are in support of this position. Kind regards, Alex On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:20 PM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Avri, Konstantinos, Robin and Mary, > > Thank you so much for working on this draft under such a tight deadline. > > > I have not had the opportunity to discuss with my NPOC colleagues, but > after my review this morning, I think it would be best if this was > submitted as a NCUC statement, or perhaps a joint statement between NCUC > and the proposed Consumer Const, if they approve. I think it is > important for this viewpoint to be shared, even if I and my NPOC > colleagues do not support the conclusions and content. I would ask that > you clearly state the statement does not represent those of the members > of the Proposed Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency. > > From the perspective of a non-profit organization that needs effective > and efficient and reasonable means to execute and protect its > philanthropic, capacity-building and humanitarian activities online > (underscored by nefarious activity occurring now related to the disaster > in Japan and the pacific area) I have serious concerns supporting the > positions taken related to Section 6, among other areas - although I > acknowledge the difference in perspectives. > > Thanks, > Debbie > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Avri Doria [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:58 AM > To: [log in to unmask] Committee > Cc: NCSG Members List > Subject: [ncsg-policy] Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs > > Hi, > > With some help and some editing, I have the draft of the statement I > intend to use, should a statement be what is mandated. > > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Board-GAC+Workshop+S > corecard+March+2011 > > I have not finished the table at the bottom yet, but will be working on > that during the meeting. > > Please discuss the wording, and in so far as we have consensus or rough > consensus on wording changes, I will make changes. The views in this > have been generated from previous positions NCSG has taken in statements > and elsewhere. The original ratings were done with the help of > Konstantinos and Robin. They have been reviewed by Mary. > > > a. > > > > > ---- > Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy >