On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
He has one point I agree with. Why should .XXX cost more than .COM ?


Why not? 

They certainly have higher costs in terms of diligence. And they do have years of litigation to recoup, and, um, I think there are few more .com registrations.

One comment in another thread made me chuckle about the irony of the phrase "intellelctual property" when applied to smut.


BTW I have posted an illustrated version of the board vote at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YidaDxIH_8I

j






On 3/21/2011 12:03 PM, DeeDee Halleck wrote:
http://blog.tommorris.org/post/3968125126/tel-xxx-and-mobi-are-all-pointless-and-idiotic

read the comments too!
dd


--
http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org




--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-