I also agree with these recommendations for our meeting with the Board. On the first issue, I am not sure whether we need to go into fleshing out particular issues from the GAC scorecard, but of course that will depend on how much time we have with the Board and how much time we want to dedicate on this topic. I like Mary’s idea of discussing this more generally; we can perhaps inquire how the Board perceives the role of the SGs in this interaction between the Board and the GAC.
KK
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Law Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
Graham Hills building,
50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: www.komaitis.org
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Τρίτη, 8 Μαρτίου 2011 10:20 μμ
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: topics for Board/NCSG discussion
Suggestions for Board/NCSG meeting:
(1) I agree that the GAC issue should be discussed. Those more familiar with the GAC scorecard and the Board's post-Brussels response would be better-placed than I to flesh out this particular topic, but one general theme could be how the Board regards AC "advice" versus GNSO recommendations.
(2) How about a discussion on the Board's view of cross-community working groups (CWGs) since that is a discussion going on in the GNSO? Particularly in view of some of the issues that have cropped up - procedural as well as more substantively - in the Rec 6 & JAS contexts.
On the SIC/Charter process - I don't think we need to discuss this with the Board at this meeting but continue to work with the SIC (thanks again for all the time and follow up, Avri!) As to the specific point about constituency approval, doesn't our draft charter have some language about appeal to the Board or the Board being able to review a negative SG decision on a constituency app?
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>>
Hi Maria, |