Sorry to jump into this late... Of course, support for Avri Regards, Alex On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, MEDA Shefqet <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Are we in a voting process? > > If yes +1 for Avri. > > Regards > > > > > > Shefqet MEDA > > Electronic and Postal Communications Authority > Directorate of Technical Regulation > Director > email: [log in to unmask] > alter. email: [log in to unmask] > mob: 0355 6720 26 388 > Str. Reshit Collaku, No-43 > Tirana > Albania > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:06 AM, asare-sakyi george <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > >> My support for you Avri and wishing you the best of luck. >> . >> Ing George Asare Sakyi >> Managing Director >> Mont Royal Technologies >> Tel: 0203001647 >> email: [log in to unmask] >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> >> *To:* [log in to unmask] >> *Sent:* Wed, April 27, 2011 11:15:17 PM >> *Subject:* Re: Election for ICANN Board seat now going on >> >> Hi, >> >> While it might be nice if we did have elections for the Board where all >> the members of the constituencies and stakeholders got to vote, at this >> point it is only the council members in the Non Contracted Parties House who >> vote. Though who knows for future elections we could propose it - though it >> might take a by-laws change. >> >> In the CSG, as I understand it, the chairs of the constituencies have >> directed how their council members must vote. Of course they have the >> choice of obeying or not since it is a secret ballot. >> >> In the NCSG, the council members are all free to decide for themselves how >> they will vote. >> >> My hope is that they will decide to vote for me. And maybe the support >> they see here will help them decide to do so. >> >> And of course it truly warms my heart to see your support. I appreciate >> it greatly. >> >> Thanks >> >> a. >> >> >> On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:59, Carlos A. Afonso wrote: >> >> > Yes, this was what I asked as well. >> > >> > --c.a. >> > >> > On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote: >> >> Sure, +1. >> >> >> >> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal >> >> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of >> support"? >> >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote: >> >>> 1+ for Avri. >> >>> >> >>> -J >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -J >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> --c.a. >> >>>> >> >>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: >> >>>>> Let me second that motion! >> >>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need >> for >> >>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring >> to >> >>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's >> >>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is >> >>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our >> >>>> own for Board seat 14. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --MM >> >>> >> >> >> > >