Yes, this was what I asked as well.

--c.a.

On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:
> Sure, +1.
> 
> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal
> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of support"?
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> 1+ for Avri.
>>
>> -J
>>
>>
>>
>> -J
>>
>>
>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --c.a.
>>>
>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>> Let me second that motion!
>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need for
>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring to
>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well.
>>>>
>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's
>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is
>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our
>>> own for Board seat 14.
>>>>
>>>> --MM
>>
>