Yes, this was what I asked as well. --c.a. On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote: > Sure, +1. > > Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal > process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of support"? > > Dan > > > On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote: >> 1+ for Avri. >> >> -J >> >> >> >> -J >> >> >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> >>> --c.a. >>> >>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: >>>> Let me second that motion! >>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need for >>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring to >>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well. >>>> >>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's >>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is >>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our >>> own for Board seat 14. >>>> >>>> --MM >> >