Sure, +1. Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a formal process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of support"? Dan On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote: > 1+ for Avri. > > -J > > > > -J > > > On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> >> --c.a. >> >> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: >> > Let me second that motion! >> > In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the need for >> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just referring to >> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well. >> > >> > The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in ICANN's >> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is >> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one of our >> own for Board seat 14. >> > >> > --MM >