Here's my vote for support, even if not for an actual vote! Caroline --------------- Frenchparents.net - Bilingual online community in San Francisco http://www.frenchparents.net InternationalParents - Le premier réseau international des familles futées The first international network for smart parents http://www.internationalparents.net/ Le 28 avr. 11 à 09:40, Alex Gakuru a écrit : > Sorry to jump into this late... > Of course, support for Avri > > Regards, > > Alex > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, MEDA Shefqet > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Are we in a voting process? > > If yes +1 for Avri. > > Regards > > > > > > Shefqet MEDA > > Electronic and Postal Communications Authority > Directorate of Technical Regulation > Director > email: [log in to unmask] > alter. email: [log in to unmask] > mob: 0355 6720 26 388 > Str. Reshit Collaku, No-43 > Tirana > Albania > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:06 AM, asare-sakyi george > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > My support for you Avri and wishing you the best of luck. > . > Ing George Asare Sakyi > Managing Director > Mont Royal Technologies > Tel: 0203001647 > email: [log in to unmask] > > > From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 11:15:17 PM > Subject: Re: Election for ICANN Board seat now going on > > Hi, > > While it might be nice if we did have elections for the Board where > all the members of the constituencies and stakeholders got to vote, > at this point it is only the council members in the Non Contracted > Parties House who vote. Though who knows for future elections we > could propose it - though it might take a by-laws change. > > In the CSG, as I understand it, the chairs of the constituencies > have directed how their council members must vote. Of course they > have the choice of obeying or not since it is a secret ballot. > > In the NCSG, the council members are all free to decide for > themselves how they will vote. > > My hope is that they will decide to vote for me. And maybe the > support they see here will help them decide to do so. > > And of course it truly warms my heart to see your support. I > appreciate it greatly. > > Thanks > > a. > > > On 27 Apr 2011, at 23:59, Carlos A. Afonso wrote: > > > Yes, this was what I asked as well. > > > > --c.a. > > > > On 04/27/2011 06:48 PM, Dan Krimm wrote: > >> Sure, +1. > >> > >> Does our input here make a formal difference (is it part of a > formal > >> process of electoral polling), or is this just a "resolution of > support"? > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> On Wed, April 27, 2011 2:34 pm, Jorge Amodio wrote: > >>> 1+ for Avri. > >>> > >>> -J > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -J > >>> > >>> > >>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Glenn Ricart <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> --c.a. > >>>> > >>>> On 04/27/2011 12:24 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > >>>>> Let me second that motion! > >>>>> In addition to Avri's intrinsic qualifications, there is the > need for > >>>> better diversity on the Board - and by that I am not just > referring to > >>>> gender but to ideological and policy diversity as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> The whole purpose of having distinct stakeholder groups in > ICANN's > >>>> GNSO is to ensure some kind of balanced representation. So it is > >>>> important that the NCSG members hold together and support one > of our > >>>> own for Board seat 14. > >>>>> > >>>>> --MM > >>> > >> > >