Hi Carlos, I thing to be in Nairobi for IGF 2011 SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN 2011/7/4 Carlos A. Afonso <[log in to unmask]> > Carissimi, > > The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be > there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we > think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there > -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process pre-Senegal? > > First of, we would need to know who will be there. > > []s fraternos > > --c.a. > > On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote: > > Thank you both. > > > > I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was > > glad to be able to read some of them in advance. > > > > Nicolas > > > > On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > >> KK: > >> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of > >> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it > >> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I > >> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We > >> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would > >> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review. > >> > >> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference > >> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view. > >> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it > >> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho. > >> > >> --MM > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > >>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM > >>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask] > >>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP > >>> Importance: High > >>> > >>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and > procedural > >>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit > >>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my > >>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic. > >>> > >>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also > >>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) > for > >>> those who do use open source software. > >>> > >>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I, > >>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July > >>> 14, 2011. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> KK > >>> > >>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100 > >>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC- > >>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC- > >>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP > >>> > >>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It > >>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others > >>> can finish it. > >>> > >>> Milton L. Mueller > >>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet > >>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org > >>> > >>> > > >