Right, I am coming to Nairobi for the IGF as well. I will be the social coordinator and show you all the hot bars! Rigia On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Balleste, Roy <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I will be arriving on the 24th. Count me in. > > Roy Balleste > Law Library Director > Associate Professor of Law > St. Thomas University > 16401 NW 37th Avenue > Miami Gardens, FL 33054 USA > 1-305-623-2341 > > -----Original Message----- > From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Alex Gakuru > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:34 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: IGF and us > > Hi Bill, > > I would be delighted to organise an outreach event! NCUCers coming > over just holla. > > Karibu Kenya! > > Alex > > On 7/14/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > There could be some interesting synergy possibilities between the IGF > and > > the ICANNsphere this time, e.g. with the new gTLD & JAS issues taken > up in > > the main sessions, the Katim-instigated initiatve on ICANN & > developing > > countries percolating pre-Dakar, etc. Maybe something could be done > along > > the lines of the outreach event Alex organized for the Nairobi ICANN, > albeit > > on a smaller scale, and/or drawing on the SF workshop format...? > > > > I'll be there from Friday 23 Sept. Meetings (GigaNet, APC, ISOC, the > > ministerial) start Monday 26th, IGF from the 27th. If anyone else > will be > > around Sat-Sun 24-25 and interested in making something happen, I'd be > happy > > to join the effort. > > > > Best > > > > Bill > > > > On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote: > > > >> Carissimi, > >> > >> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be > >> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we > >> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being > there > >> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process > pre-Senegal? > >> > >> First of, we would need to know who will be there. > >> > >> []s fraternos > >> > >> --c.a. > >> > >> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote: > >>> Thank you both. > >>> > >>> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i > was > >>> glad to be able to read some of them in advance. > >>> > >>> Nicolas > >>> > >>> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > >>>> KK: > >>>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of > >>>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it > >>>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I > >>>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. > We > >>>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would > >>>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review. > >>>> > >>>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference > >>>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of > view. > >>>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it > >>>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, > imho. > >>>> > >>>> --MM > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > >>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM > >>>>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask] > >>>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP > >>>>> Importance: High > >>>>> > >>>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and > >>>>> procedural > >>>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a > bit > >>>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in > my > >>>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically > pedantic. > >>>>> > >>>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have > also > >>>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version > (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) > >>>>> for > >>>>> those who do use open source software. > >>>>> > >>>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May > I, > >>>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than > July > >>>>> 14, 2011. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> > >>>>> KK > >>>>> > >>>>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>>>> Reply-To: Milton L > Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100 > >>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC- > >>>>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC- > >>>>> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >>>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP > >>>>> > >>>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the > effort. It > >>>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope > others > >>>>> can finish it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Milton L. Mueller > >>>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies > Internet > >>>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device >