On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
> Carissimi,
>
> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there
> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process pre-Senegal?
>
> First of, we would need to know who will be there.
>
> []s fraternos
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>> Thank you both.
>>
>> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was
>> glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> KK:
>>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
>>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
>>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
>>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We
>>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
>>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
>>>
>>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
>>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view.
>>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
>>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho.
>>>
>>> --MM
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:
[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
>>>> To: Milton L Mueller;
[log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
>>>> Importance: High
>>>>
>>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and procedural
>>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit
>>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my
>>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic.
>>>>
>>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also
>>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (
http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) for
>>>> those who do use open source software.
>>>>
>>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I,
>>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July
>>>> 14, 2011.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> KK
>>>>
>>>> From: Milton L Mueller<
[log in to unmask]<mailto:
[log in to unmask]>>
>>>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<
[log in to unmask]<mailto:
[log in to unmask]>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
>>>> To: "
[log in to unmask]<mailto:
NCSG-NCUC-
>>>>
[log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC-
>>>>
[log in to unmask]<mailto:
[log in to unmask]>>
>>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
>>>>
>>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It
>>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others
>>>> can finish it.
>>>>
>>>> Milton L. Mueller
>>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet
>>>> Governance Project
http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>