I will be arriving on the 24th. Count me in. Roy Balleste Law Library Director Associate Professor of Law St. Thomas University 16401 NW 37th Avenue Miami Gardens, FL 33054 USA 1-305-623-2341 -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alex Gakuru Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:34 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: IGF and us Hi Bill, I would be delighted to organise an outreach event! NCUCers coming over just holla. Karibu Kenya! Alex On 7/14/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi > > There could be some interesting synergy possibilities between the IGF and > the ICANNsphere this time, e.g. with the new gTLD & JAS issues taken up in > the main sessions, the Katim-instigated initiatve on ICANN & developing > countries percolating pre-Dakar, etc. Maybe something could be done along > the lines of the outreach event Alex organized for the Nairobi ICANN, albeit > on a smaller scale, and/or drawing on the SF workshop format...? > > I'll be there from Friday 23 Sept. Meetings (GigaNet, APC, ISOC, the > ministerial) start Monday 26th, IGF from the 27th. If anyone else will be > around Sat-Sun 24-25 and interested in making something happen, I'd be happy > to join the effort. > > Best > > Bill > > On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote: > >> Carissimi, >> >> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be >> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we >> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there >> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process pre-Senegal? >> >> First of, we would need to know who will be there. >> >> []s fraternos >> >> --c.a. >> >> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote: >>> Thank you both. >>> >>> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was >>> glad to be able to read some of them in advance. >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote: >>>> KK: >>>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of >>>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it >>>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I >>>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We >>>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would >>>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review. >>>> >>>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference >>>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view. >>>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it >>>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho. >>>> >>>> --MM >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM >>>>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask] >>>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP >>>>> Importance: High >>>>> >>>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and >>>>> procedural >>>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit >>>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my >>>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic. >>>>> >>>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also >>>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) >>>>> for >>>>> those who do use open source software. >>>>> >>>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I, >>>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July >>>>> 14, 2011. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> KK >>>>> >>>>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>>>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100 >>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC- >>>>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC- >>>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP >>>>> >>>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It >>>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others >>>>> can finish it. >>>>> >>>>> Milton L. Mueller >>>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet >>>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org >>>>> >>>>> >>> > -- Sent from my mobile device